Thursday, October 16, 2014

Thoughts on Civic Education


“When I found so astonishing a power placed within my hands, I hesitated a long time concerning the manner in which I should employ it. Although I possess the capacity of bestowing animation, yet to prepare a frame for the reception of it, with all its intricacies of fibers, muscles, and veins, still remained a work of inconceivable difficulty and labor. I doubted at first whether I should attempt the creation of being like myself, or one of simpler organization; but my imagination was too much exalted by my first success to permit me to doubt of my ability to give life to an animal as complex and wonderful as man.” (Shelly & Brantley, 1967)


            It had been a typical day in my classroom when the usually placid Mariella excitedly ran into my room shouted out, “Mr. Bosse, I thought of something in my English class.  James Madison is Victor Frankenstein!” I looked at her puzzled for a brief moment and asked her to explain.  In a hurried manner, she explained that Madison had done a lot of research to find the “formula” of good government just as Frankenstein had created his monster from various desirable humans.  In the previous class we had done a document analysis activity with Federalist no. 1, in which I helped students realize that the need for the Constitution at the time of the Founding.  Additionally, this was the point when I introduced Federalist and Anti-federalist arguments about the ratification of the Constitution.  What Mariella had done was to synthesize the analysis she had done in relation to Mary Shelley's Frankenstein, the book she was currently reading in English.  While it seems like an odd thought, it makes perfect sense.  As we discussed Mariella’s comment as a whole class (it seemed like a logical tangent from what was planned for the day), it became evident that my students already comprehended the fact that education and a nurturing environment is what Frankenstein’s Monster, and the people around him, lacked and is precisely what our nation and the Constitution needs in order to thrive.  It was that moment in my teaching career that the importance of what I was doing truly materialized in my mind.  After All, it had not been everyday that I had the opportunity to engage others in such deep and relevant dialogue about the Constitution, let alone a large class of 13-14 year-olds.
            One thing that unites us as Americans is our innate sense of freedom.  In a time when fighting for individual rights, our place in the economic world, security, and an intense political theatre cause many to have a bleak outlook on our nation, I see these issues to be at the heart of Constitutional scholarship.  Despite differing opinions, we can rally around the Constitution.  The problems we face now are not all that different from a time when James Madison set out to write the Virginia Plan.  In writing “Of Modern and Ancient Confederacies,” Madison illustrates the realization that the problems of his day were similar to the problems of past governments.  In essence, these problems are part of the human experience.  The “monster” that Madison set out to create was believed to be capable of counteracting those problems.  Or, in the very least, would provide future generations the tools necessary to combat the ills of bad government without, as Thomas Jefferson proposed, shedding the “blood of patriots and tyrants.”  
            In Federalist No. 49, Madison observed that “The people are the only legitimate fountain of power, and it is from them that the constitutional charter, under which the several branches of government hold their power, is derived.”  Madison’s words were true then and are even more relevant today, as we have seen an increase in population and diversity among the people.  However, at the same time, we seem to have a crisis on our hands when it comes to civic engagement.  Far too many people feel powerless in a time when they feel their government is less than ideal.  The result is an electorate that is not holding up its end of the deal that Madison brokered.  As a people, we must return to arming ourselves with Constitutional knowledge and get involved.  We, and it begins with educators like myself, need to “Secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity”.  I believe that the prescription is teaching our youth about our structure of government, their rights as citizens (and noncitizens), voter education, and building a sense of community within and outside our schools.  It has to go beyond simply teaching, to actually engage students in lifelong civic engagement.  Madison’s constitution is a reflection upon and agreement amongst ourselves.  What does it say about us as a people, if we are not engaged in the essence of what makes us a people?  

            As a civics teacher, I have had many moments like my student’s revelation about Frankenstein, but my work as a We the People coach has also reaped benefits in regard to the Constitutional scholarship of my students and their families.  While they amount to only 27 out of nearly 600 8th graders in my school, they are a force to be reckoned with when it comes to getting an entire class in debate about government actions and current events.  I hear from parents quite often that their student even engages their family in Constitutional inquiry.  My small group students are truly paying it forward.  That in alone is a testament to the power of civic education with a focus understanding and applying the Constitution.  If Madison truly is like Frankenstein, it is my sincere hope that the work I do as a civics educator will help to ensure that his creation never becomes a monster that the people fear.

Monday, March 17, 2014

Who We Are


Over the past couple weeks, I have heard many people talking about how the current generation of students are not as hard-working, intelligent, and respectful as the older generations. I remember hearing the same thing about my own generation. I find myself in an interesting situation where, based on age, I fall between my students and many of the teachers I work with on a daily basis. As a result I feel less inclined to be resigned to the negative beliefs about the current generation., while at the same time recognizing where older adults are coming from. When I think back to middle school, I have tons of memories of doing crazy things over the course of a typical school day; much more so than I witness in students today. Due to the changing environment of schools, students simply have less freedom of movement within the school. Due to testing demands, they have very little downtime as they are pushed into remediation and supposed enrichment activities during the school day. When I compare the amount of information that I was expected to learn, it pales in comparison to what we are currently expected to load students up with. The reality is that students today do care and want to do well. Technology, media, education, and family structure are drastically different than what older generations are used to. At a time when students need to be engaged in dialogue about where they see our country headed and that their place in our story is, many adults are quick to write them off. This is not who we are.

A City Upon a Hill

An interesting question to pose to students is, "What makes, or would make, the United States a shining city upon a hill?" As with most analytical questions, let's start off with some primary sources to build some background knowledge for students.

John Winthrop delivered his aspirations for Massachusetts in A Model of Christian Charity in 1630. Winthrop knew that the survival of his colony depended on its inhabitants dependency on and dedication to each other. "For we must consider that we shall be a shining city upon a hill.  The eyes of all people are upon us." Winthrop was referring to the Puritan society of his colony, but his words cross generations and set a tone for our society at large. When our nation has been at a crossroads, Presidents like John F. Kennedy and Ronald Reagan, drew from Winthrop's words to describe the current political and social climates. What is interesting is the different angles that each president used to invoke "a city upon a hill." 


Just weeks before his inauguration, John F. Kennedy delivered his remarks to the Massachusetts State Legislature.  "Today the eyes of all people are truly upon us — and our governments, in every branch, at every level, national, state and local, must be as a city upon a hill — constructed and inhabited by men aware of their great trust and their great responsibilities." In essence, and in a nod to James Madison in Federalist no. 51, Kennedy acknowledges that our government is only as noble as the people who serve in it. Kennedy goes on to say that, "History will not judge our endeavors -- and a government cannot be selected -- merely on the basis of color or creed or even party affliction.  Neither will competence and loyalty and stature, while essential to the utmost, suffice in times such as these."

Many argue that Kennedy's invocation of the city upon a hill signals a belief that robust, but noble, government is central to American exceptionalism. Kennedy questioned whether "...were we truly men of courage . . . the courage to resist public pressure, as well as private greed?"



In his 1984 Farewell Address, Ronald Reagan describes his view of the United States as a city upon a hill. "I've spoken of the shining city all my political life, but I don't know if I ever quite communicated what I saw when I said it. But in my mind it was a tall proud city built on rocks stronger than oceans, wind-swept, God-blessed, and teeming with people of all kinds living in harmony and peace, a city with free ports that hummed with commerce and creativity, and if there had to be city walls, the walls had doors and the doors were open to anyone with the will and the heart to get here. That's how I saw it and see it still." Ronald Reagan's city upon the hill is one focused more on political and economic freedom. In contrast to Kennedy, Reagan believed that "expansion of government results in contraction of liberty."



In these different approaches to the city upon a hill maxim we see different political means to the same end. An end in which the United States is a political, social, and economic model for the entire world. Ronald Reagan is also credited with stating that "If we forget what we did, we will forget who we are." The way I see it, there is no better reason than this for emphasis on civic education and engaging the new generation in formulating their own view of the city upon a hill. Ask your students what would make their city upon a hill. Sharing and comments are welcome. Thanks for reading!

Tuesday, March 4, 2014

Leveraging What is Already Developed - Part 1

I always have huge aspirations for developing content for my students.  However, when it comes down to it, there simply isn't enough time.  Interesting web-based content about the Constitution is hard to come by, but fortunately there are a handful of great resources that I rely on regularly.  

In this first of several posts on leveraging already developed content, I will focus on Hip Hughes History. It is treasure trove of content to enrich, flip, and engage students in the Constitution, Supreme Court cases, and current events.


What I like about Hip Hughes is that his content is created with a flipped classroom in mind.  To that end, he is very engaging and explains concepts in a manner that students understand.  He uses analogies and real-world examples to convey complex ideas.

Last summer Google added the ability to embed images and YouTube videos to Google Forms.  This capability makes it easier than ever to use video for pre-teaching and formative assessment.  It is also an effective tool for creating simple homework assignments by embedding a Hip Hughes video, and adding a couple reflection questions.  Students can watch the video and respond to the questions in the Google Form.  It works on all devises and students do not need additional resources to complete the task.  This activity follows all of the best practices for effective homework.  The image below is a sample form using an embedded Hip Hughes video on the 10th Amendment.  It includes two questions.  The first is just getting students to summarize the main idea of the video, and the second question gets at the essential understanding that I want students to gain from the activity.  These types of activities yield a 90+% completion rate from my students, whereas traditional homework assignments typically yield a 50-60% completion rate.



There are a number of ways that Hip Hughes content can be used in the classroom.  That is one of the aspects that make it such a good source for content.  Head over to Hip Hughes History and check it out for yourself.  In part 2 I will focus on the Your Weekly Constitutional podcast. Share your thoughts in the comments section.